View Single Post
09-03-2009, 11:52 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 342
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by FreddtFoyle View Post
You've got this in three threads. It was known at the time and discussed by some of us, but it was all "off the record" for some reason. Because of that, I for one didn't talk about it on the radio.
Foyle is right. This was discussed at the tournament but it's part and parcel of the way they do things at the CIS level. Seedings are manipulated for any number of reasons. U of A had every legitimate reason to question SMU as the top seed, particularly since it had been no. 1 most of the season in the rankings. Rankings are just a guide and that's evident with the way seedings are processed leading into national tournaments. Unless they find a better system to determine national champions, the current system is about the best we can expect.

austrooper is offline   Reply With Quote