Thread: Proposal: Van/phi
View Single Post
09-05-2009, 03:14 AM
Registered User
phlocky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,150
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by bieksa 3 View Post
Raycroft was the number 3 goalie for 1 game
Um, WRONG, Raycroft was benched, and in the pressbox most nights as the #3 goalie before the trade. Stop trying to make it out like Rask returned a top 10 goalie (or FUTURE top 10 goalie). He was already figured out by the league and wasn't even dressed by his own team most games the year of his trade. He was just plain BAD, aweful, ugly in net. There is no suguar coating it, he was not good.

Raycroft had nearly 4 GAA (almost double the previous years GAA) right before he was traded. Raycroft would have been equivalent toe Nittimaki from the Flyers last year, THAT'S the comparison you are making.

phlocky is offline   Reply With Quote