Thread: Proposal: Van-Pit
View Single Post
Old
09-05-2009, 03:37 AM
  #70
phlocky
Registered User
 
phlocky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,153
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=roddy;20984002]I don't think people are saying "we have a strong two-way center, why get another one" - I think they are saying "we have a strong two-way center, why give up a physical offensive defenseman who is unlike any other player in the organization to get another two-way center."

I'd love to have Staal on the Canucks, but not at the expense of Kevin Bieksa.[/QUOTE]

THAT is perfectly fine and reasonable and yes, I agree with you. However, if Vanc DIDN'T have Kesler then this package would NOT be enough to get Staal. This proposal just falis on so many levels from BOTH teams perspective.

phlocky is offline   Reply With Quote