Thread: Proposal: Trade Proposal: Anton Babchuk
View Single Post
Old
09-09-2009, 10:27 AM
  #51
blahblah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 16,373
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casework View Post
I find it laughable that it's MY comment you take issue with. Rutherford has stated he'd like to get a D prospect in return, that's all. Well, I'd also like to win the lottery.
Issue? Not really. I was honestly wondering if you had some other thought(s) that lead you to the conclusion that the majority needed that reminder. Had you simply quoted TW or the OP, I wouldn't have bothered.

The irrational Chimera talk has nothing to do with underestimating the 'Canes situation, it's desired by people who don't like him or want to use his money to pay for Babchuk.

So in reality that left you trying to debate mostly with TW on not overpaying. If you keep TW's comments in context, you realize that in both cases he doesn't feel like we'd be overpaying. I'm willing to bet cold hard cash that he completely understands the situation the 'Canes are in. And, honestly, Ruth really isn't overpaying. You seem to indiate that the 'Canes want a d prospect in return won't happen. A marginal d prospect for an NHL player with no roster player in return? Seems fairly rational and believable.


Last edited by blahblah: 09-09-2009 at 10:33 AM.
blahblah is offline   Reply With Quote