View Single Post
11-15-2004, 02:53 PM
Registered User
Pepper's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,528
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Tom_Benjamin
So? That doesn't make either of them wrong.
There's no right or wrong here, it's a difference in opinion. And the opinions of those two carry very little weight among the fanbase or in general.

If that's Red Fisher and Steve Yzerman saying the same things, then I'd be much more willing to give them a benefit of a doubt. Guerin has zero credibility in my eyes and a Brooks' articles are like carwrecks, you just have to look at them.

Originally Posted by Tom_Benjamin
Why don't you try to defend Bettman instead of attacking Brooks or Guerin? Explain how either of the examples I used are the actions of a person with any sense of honour or decency. Do you trust Gary Bettman? Do you think he gives a damn about hockey? Where's the evidence? What's he ever done for the sport besides make it more expensive?
Because I don't like Bettman either, he shouldn't be a comissioner because he has no hockey background and doesn't respect the long traditions hockey has. He has done lots of bad things, however in this CBA issue I'm on the owners side.

Pepper is offline