Thread: Recalled/Assigned: 4 players sent to Rochester
View Single Post
Old
10-06-2009, 02:55 PM
  #19
dbhislife
Registered User
 
dbhislife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,279
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint View Post
Because you're bringing up a dead topic that has no relevance any longer and demanding an apology like an entitled 12 year old because you were wrong about something and someone disagreed with you.



Well he was wrong, then. However, at that time no one could have guessed that we would have signed Moore, and also at the time it was up in the air whether we were going to be carrying a full 23-man roster. I implied it was a possibility, as it has happened many times with many teams in the past, but not necessarily a certainty.

As it turns out, we're carrying 13 forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goalies for a grand total of 22 roster players. In any given night, two of them will not be dressed, yet they will still actually be roster players.



I am well aware of the link that I MYSELF posted. I wasn't highlighting that all those players would make the roster. I was asking you to count the number of players. There were 14 forwards listed. 13 were sure to be roster players. Which means that AT LEAST ONE rookie would be making the squad as the final forward, even if not dressed every night.

If you want to chalk this up to semantic differences or misunderstanding of words, then fine. I'm not arguing this topic any longer. You're sure as **** not getting an apology from me, however.
but 13 of those 14 guys didn't end up being roster players....therefore it wasn't sure. Certainly you cannot deny that duco and repik are both gone


all I am pointing out is you jumped down my throat rather quickly...and in the end a lot of what I said ended up being what happened. One kid is in our top 4 lines, and the others are in the A

dbhislife is offline   Reply With Quote