View Single Post
11-23-2004, 04:36 PM
And the winner is...
Chaos's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Watauga, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 7,946
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Chaos
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Many people most likely agree with rt.

That list is so bias it made me chuckle.
Lets go down the list one by one:

01) Johan Fransson 8.0C- Saying he has the upside of a #2 defenseman is hardly a stretch, but because he's a few years away, he has a C.
02) Trevor Daley 7.5B- You yourself don't think he'll be more than a #3. Well a 7 is 3-4 d-man, so this is saying he's a really good #3. Again, not a stretch.
03) Shawn Belle 8.0D- This guy has all the tools to be great, but also has a lot of hockey sense issues. Chances are he won't reach his true potential, hence the D.
04) Mark Fistric 7.0A- Potential to be a solid #4 guy, and is a fairly safe bet to get there.
05) Niclas Grossman 7.0B- Compared to Mattias Norstrom by the guy who runs, a few years away so he gets a B
06) Matt Nickerson 6.0B- Bottom pairin, enforcer type. Again, I dont see a problem with giving him a 6.
07) Dan Jancevski 6.0A- You get what you see with him; a #6/7 guy who plays decent defensively
08) Elias Granath 5.5B- Guy who wont get out of the AHL without injuries occuring
09) Nik Vaino 5.5B- Same as Granath
10) John Erskine 5.5A- Similar situation to Jancevski; you get what you see.
11) Trevor Ludwig 5.0B- AHL spare
12) Lukas Vomela 5.0B-AHL spare
13) Geoff Waugh 5.0A-AHL spare
14) Vadim Khomitski 5.0C-AHL spare

Chaos is online now