View Single Post
Old
12-10-2004, 05:03 PM
  #43
xander
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Section A Lynah Rink
Posts: 4,081
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue
Luxury tax works just fine and does far more to address the real problems of the leaugue (lack of revenues) than a ridiculous $31m hardcap. You bring up the Yankees, however not one owner pipes up when Steinbrenner signs over $80m. What the NHLPA has done is essentially given up what Bettman wanted. The only thing that he did not get is a hard cap. Both sides are going to have to give. The players gave. Bettman has to.
And how can you possibly scoff at the rollback? If you cannot see how this proposal gives the owners what they want, then....ahh...some things are just better unsaid.
If Bettman cannot work of this proposal he will deserve the every bit of the public flogging that the media will give him.
I agree that A luxery tax can work, but this luxery tax definatly can not. It's got to be up in the 70% 100% range. It's ok if one team goes over the cap and pays through the roof, but none of the wealthy teams are going to respect a 20% tax over $45 Million. But i'm still hopeful, lets see what the owners comeback with.

xander is offline