View Single Post
11-27-2009, 07:57 PM
Registered User
pappyline's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mass/formerly Ont
Country: United States
Posts: 4,369
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Canadiens Fan View Post
Fair enough. I would agree that Orr was the best player in the world at the time, but let's say that Hull had begun to fall back a bit from number two.

Personally, I would put Phil Esposito ahead of Hull in the fall of 1972. After all, he'd won the last three scoring titles up to that point and was about to win the next two.
Espo was never close to Hull in ability.Scoring titles does not always = best player.

pappyline is offline   Reply With Quote