View Single Post
12-10-2009, 03:45 PM
Registered User
Rome's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 284
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Bluenote13 View Post
I disagree.

When your cupboard is bare, you don't pick the biggest question mark, and that was Hugh at the time.
Like I said, we took a roll of the dice and had a 50/50 shot. Jessiman was high risk/high reward.

The melodramatics like to make it out to be as if we somehow knew as a matter of fact that Jessiman would bust and that we wanted to screw the team over.

Next they'll say we knew Cherepanov had his heart condition and that we should have taken Max Pacioretty or David Perron.

Revisionist history is fun!

Rome is offline   Reply With Quote