View Single Post
Old
09-23-2003, 02:28 PM
  #26
MrMackey
Registered User
 
MrMackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cgy
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thome_26
oh, and how could you take York over Poti? On the market Poti's value is much more then Yorks! Poti is a Dman who put up just as good numbers as York!! Sorry, but the Oilers lost that deal. Although York has worked out and looks great as an Oiler and I really like him - a 50 point Dman compared to a 60 (if york woulda been healthy 60 woulda been a lock) isn't even close.
I don't know about this. York's come in here and been very valuable to the organization... all but untouchable.

Whereas Poti put up great numbers as soon as he went to New York, but he was in almost all of the Ranger trade rumours over the summer, and Sather stated his displeasure two years in a row about having to go to arbitration with him.

We do need a puck moving defenseman, but we don't need a liability. I'd rather have Bergeron than Poti.

MrMackey is offline