View Single Post
Old
01-09-2005, 06:20 PM
  #17
Kovy274Hart
Registered User
 
Kovy274Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shaolin
Country: United States
Posts: 1,498
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Kovy274Hart
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOrtmeyer41
At the time when I saw the De Vries deal for Rachunek and Giroux, I thought that Rangers would have to offer a bit more. Giroux almost made the Sens last year, and to be honest when I saw that we also got him in the deal along with Rachunek, I thought the Rangers won big time. Was Muckler drunk when he made the deal? I heard that De Vries was not playing good when he was playing with the Senators. Now my question to all Rangers fans, Senators fans, who do u think won this deal? Rangers got 2 good players for De Vries a stay at home dman who makes alot of money. If Giroux makes the Rangers in the future and performs well this will be one of the best deals Sather made at the deadline.

I liked the deal too. But it's only good if Rachunek does better than he showed and Giroux becomes a regular.

Kovy274Hart is offline