View Single Post
Old
09-24-2003, 09:42 PM
  #38
Darth Milbury
Registered User
 
Darth Milbury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Searching for Kvasha
Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 37,503
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtVandelei
My appologies, but Darth, you've been talking out of your ass this whole thread.

Your whole argument is comprised of ill-informed, biased opinions. Fine, I'm used to that. However, you did mention several things as fact, and I'm going to call u on them.

"Tucker will get u 30-40 points a season"

Tucker has averaged 45 points a season his last 5 years in NHL

"Scatchard is better than Tucker offensively"

Scatchard has averaged 35 points a season in his last 5 years in NHL


Furthermore, you go on to give Tuckers -7 last season to show him as a bad defensive player.

The season prior to last, he was +24, I believe 2nd best on the Leafs.
3 of his last 4 seasons, he's been a + player.

Please, Darth. I do hope you speak of pure ignorance rather than malice.

Tucker would no doubt be the 3rd best forward on the Isles, right behind Peca and Yashin. Scatchard and Parrish would come real close.

Finally, no doubt Hamrlik is a better player than Darcy. However, I find it humourous at how much value he has on this board.

Ninimaa is every bit as good as Roman, and much cheaper than Roman. He went for Isbister (inferior asset to Tucker) and Torres (worth a bit more than Bell+2nd). Looking at that, in today's market, an offer of Tucker, Bell and a 2nd is definately fair.

Whatever dude. This whole thread got old a long, long time ago

Isles don't want Tucker.
Leafs aren't getting Hamrlik.
None of the players you guys mentioned (including Tucker) have much in the way of trade value.

End of story.

Moderator, why don't you do us all a favor and shut this one down?

Darth Milbury is offline