Another Havlat proposal, one no one will like.
View Single Post
01-21-2005, 01:12 AM
Join Date: Jun 2004
Using Smyth's "intangibles" in a Havlat argument to differenciate value is one thing but Frolov's?
Havlat for Frolov is pretty much lateral IMO, lose some D gain some O.
Ottawa loses out on the 2nd part. White is more valuable to us centering Alfie than a 4th rd pick.
Keep Frolov we'll keep Havlat.
Last edited by Bileur: 01-21-2005 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bileur