Trade Deadline, UFAs, RFAs and more - Part II
View Single Post
03-01-2010, 02:09 PM
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Originally Posted by
This is where I think Shooter is a little delusional. I do not give up on parent yet, especially for a rental unless he was part of a package for a quality goalie. Hamhuis is an upgrade no doubt but goaltending is still a major issue. So you lose Parent who next year will be still on a cheap contract (unless homer pulls his usual) that you will need to fill out your bottom pair, while also letting him develop further.
Now if they acquire Hamhuis and resign him then trade coburn or carle, than I think that changes things.
Has a team ever gone into the draft with no picks?
Right, but if you've come the conclusion that Parent cannot be a long-term fixture due to injuries...why not take on Hamhuis for this run?
I agree completely on the goalie front.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Jester