View Single Post
Old
03-02-2010, 01:00 AM
  #119
Johnny Canucker
Registered User
 
Johnny Canucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,165
vCash: 500
I said that ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riven View Post
You stated that Mitchell will get the same money somewhere else and then followed it up by stating that we won't be able to find a replacement, thus the team is screwed. I assumed you were continuing on the assumption that Mitchell will sign elsewhere next year and Gillis would need to find a replacement for him in the off-season.

As far as this year is concerned, I can't see the point in giving up significant assets to replace an injured Mitchell. Next season we will begin to see some young talent available to help with our third line needs and defensive call-up depth from the Moose. Now is the time for Gillis to show patience and to stay the course.

If Mitchell is not returning next year, we should be able to pick up veteran defensive help for a low asset cost in the off-season.

Of course, if someone is off-loading a contract for little in return, another Ehrhoff deal, then I am all for shoring up the defence!

Johnny Canucker is offline   Reply With Quote