View Single Post
Old
01-30-2005, 12:17 PM
  #12
Clash*
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Country: Ireland
Posts: 5,295
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie
6)Torres, Reasoner, Hemsky for Jokinen, Hagman
More unrealistic, but wanted to throw out one more idea and just quickly came up with this off the top of my head. Probably an overpayment on the Oilers behalf, but each of the players they give up are replaceable from within the system while Jokinen really fills a team need.

Anyways, blast away
Completely unrealistic. Why would Florida, with the problems they already have, want to acquire your problem, the lack of a top line center, for items that can be found through UFA or (if and when) on the waiver wire? After the amount of times there have been proposals featuring Edmonton and Florida, and some of those have proposed much better value, why would you try and lowball the team?

Florida and Edmonton are possibly the two worst trade partners at this times. Let it go people. Jokinen and crew are not able to leave without someone clearly capable of assuming his role comin back in return. And in this trade, there is no one remotely capable of fillin his skates.

Clash* is offline