View Single Post
Old
03-24-2010, 10:47 AM
  #9
Winger23
Registered User
 
Winger23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,674
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Bunny Foo Foo View Post
It's because the hits to the head ruling became official yesterday.
I am no Tucker fan, but this is a b.s. suspension.
It was icing man. You can't have players driving guys through the boards on icing calls. I understand Greene lost an edge. Tucker should not have been making contact in the first place, he should have been attempting to play the puck first to prevent the icing call. During the replaces they even have a camera focused in on the linesman yelling at the players its going to be icing.

I don't think it was a dirty play, and again don't think it warrents a suspension if its not on an icing call.

Winger23 is online now   Reply With Quote