View Single Post
Old
02-15-2005, 10:28 AM
  #4
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,508
vCash: 500
Quote:
One could argue that if Goodenow was going to concede to a cap , he should have done it 2 months ago so the players wouldn't have lost as much of their salaries as they did?!?!
what does this have to do with the original post?

and even if goodenow conceded a cap 2 months ago, there's no guarantee an actual deal would have been in place. it might have just emboldened the NHL to push harder to get a better deal for themselves. "ok you'll take a cap? alright, well that's good but now we don't want arbitration, and we want to keep the FA age around 30, and we want a revenue link at 50%" etc etc

it's just not that simple

Levitate is offline