Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas
Nah man, McKenzie knows his stuff. When you consider the Kings only finished 2 points back of the Canucks, and the fact the Canucks have injury troubles and have been a little inconsistent of late (esp. Luongo), I can see why some people might pick LA as the upset.
|
I don't dis him for that, as widely unlikely as it seems.
McKenzie is a vocal advocate of soft hockey, and an NHL trade buster. That is what I see his role as on TSN.
I don't see his analysis at all useful as far as hockey in concerned. The Kings could very well win this series, anyone could win any given series, and I would rather my Canucks lose than play bad hockey. His opinion (which was not known to me I guess until now) on the series doesn't really mean much either way.