View Single Post
04-14-2010, 11:32 AM
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Melrose_Jr. View Post
I really don't like this strategy. Torts has essentially put the team in a position where they MUST make a dramatic move with Redden now. I'm not sure that continuing to poison the well in Hartford with NYR malcontents is really a best case scenario for anyone either.

Does this guy ever trying building a bridge, or just default to burning them down with flamethrowers when he meets someone he doesn't happen to agree with?
Do you want Redden poising the Rangers for the next 4 years? Or the Pack?

We all want him gone, so does Torts. Good on him to take charge to make sure it happens to improve the team and clear cap space. Obviously Sather will have to push the buttons, but Torts is making sure those will be pushed.

Why would Torts build a bridge with Redden? That's not magically going to make him a top 2 dman again. Cut ties with him already.

I dont see anything that makes me believe Avery is going anywhere in the article. So his name wasnt brought up. So? People are already overrating with this over nothing, title very misleading

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote