View Single Post
Old
03-06-2005, 10:25 PM
  #106
trentmccleary
Registered User
 
trentmccleary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alfie-Ville
Posts: 18,073
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicious Vic
Not really applicable, IMO. Not only have scouts come a long way in judging a goalie's talent since then
Huh? I stopped posting goalies names because most hadn't played yet. So it has yet to be determined whether scouts have improved or not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicious Vic
but you don't word one about the goalie's recently taken in the top 5. Luongo, Lehtonen, Dipietro, and Fleury. Not a bad crop at all and all of them have extremely high ceiling's and values. Much more specific and revelent to the argument at hand, IMO.
Not really. Luongo is established.
The other 3 have combined for 105 games. Of which, 50 are Dipietro's breakthrough season. The other 55 games are a putrid reminder of why goalies shouldn't play in the NHL before they're 20. So far though, Fleury clearly ranks 4th on that list.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicious Vic
As for Emery and Havlat for Fleury, you'll notice that not once did I say the Sens would do it. I just said that's what it would take to get him. You don't say word one about how any team that wanted Maffy would have to grossly overpay for him because he's such and integral part of the Pens future. Sorry, but that's the way it is.
A "price" is an agreed upon equilibrium between the producer and consumer on the value of a product. If consumers walk away from you thinking Pittsburgh is full of crackheads... that is not a "price", it is a pipe dream.

trentmccleary is offline