View Single Post
05-21-2010, 06:11 PM
DIEHARD the King fan
Registered User
DIEHARD the King fan's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: blueline to slot
Country: United States
Posts: 6,244
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by regulate View Post
Speaking of prejudice, looks like you have some issues.
Actually, the more accurate read on this subject is that I have experience. Ask any criminal defense attorney, or an honest prosecutor (harder to find). They will tell you the same thing.

Did I just prove your point for you?

Quick story: I dont think I've handled a case in the last 2-3 years where a vehicle, person or house was searched, where the ultimate defendant didn't allegedly consent to the search and then admit that what was found was his/hers. Its standard fare included in almost all police reports now, and because the police claim "consent" was given the possibility of search and seizure issues being helpful to a defendant is drastically reduced.

Every defendant, even the most savvy, and ther are lots of those, now always consents and always confesses. Its much cleaner for the prosecution that way!

DIEHARD the King fan is offline