View Single Post
Old
05-21-2010, 08:17 PM
  #42
darko
Registered User
 
darko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Country: Australia
Posts: 31,228
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAuldie View Post
I may be way off but I hate the idea of drafting a kid so high and sticking him as a closer.

Wouldn't he be far more valuable as a starter? If he doesn't have the make up of a starter, he shouldn't have been drafted so high imo.

Closers have become overrated lately. You can find a decent closer fairly cheap (Aardsma in Seattle.. Gregg has been decent yesterday aside in TO).

He would have to develop a 3rd pitch. Right now he has low to mid 90s fastball and that curveball, he does have a changeup but needs to work on it. His control is also somewhat of an issue. Storen worked and excelled as a closer is college so why change. He was also close to majors and Nats were desperate for bullpen help thus he was drafted so high.

I do agree with you however, I find it abit silly drafting a closer that high especially considering they could've taken someone like Mike Trout or Shelby Miller.

darko is offline   Reply With Quote