View Single Post
06-15-2010, 09:31 AM
Join Date: Apr 2007
Originally Posted by
Would Robert Lang be a fair comparison? Somewhat clumsy and not overly quick but big, smart, and effective...
I believe the expression would be "poor man's" Robert Lang, but yeah, it's fair enough from a fundamentals point of view (if you cancel Lang as a powerplay guy with Engqvist being a PK guy). Remember that even going back to Lang's first Olympic days he was known as a bit of a scorer, whereas Engqvist really isn't (more balanced, and less game-breaking ability).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Ohashi_Jouzu