View Single Post
06-22-2010, 05:42 PM
Registered User
HowToHockey's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Huntsville, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 465
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by I am The Mush View Post
I think they would have found, had they gotten some very good, very strong shooters, is that up to the point the shooters were no longer strong enough to get a lot of flex in the stick, that a stiffer stick would create a harder shot. Reason being that a stiff stick that is bent back X degrees is storing a greater amount of potential energy than a whippy one at X degrees. The ladies involved probably weren't big enough to load the stiffer sticks with an efficient shooting motion (they're also probably using shorter sticks, so the speed of the blade as they go through the motion, discounting the effect of flex, is slower too).
sort of similar to the pounds of pressure when shooting a crossbow, the more pounds the harder it is to pull back, but the harder you can shoot it. Obviously lower pounds for weaker people.

I think though that a lighter puck would go faster.

Hockey Tips Around the Web
Website:Check out my Hockey Training blog
Fitting Guides for Equipment: New To Hockey Fitting Guides
The Hockey Movement The Hockey Movement
HowToHockey is offline   Reply With Quote