View Single Post
07-01-2010, 10:11 PM
Puckaroni and cheese
PredsV82's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Outside
Country: Scotland
Posts: 12,318
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by clyankees47 View Post
We all know that Suter and Weber are better d-men offensively and overall compared to Hamhuis. But if we were talking strictly from a defensive standpoint, how would you guys rank Suter, Weber, and Hamhuis?
1. Suter
3. Hamhuis

(sorry, but those two are better than hamhuis, both offensively and defensively)

Hammer is solid most of the time but will make you want to scream when he does screw up. If Luongo bails out his occasional mistakes you'll probably not be disappointed, at least not until you need an extra 2 mil to sign someone else and realize its tied up in hamhuis.

i guess the best i can come up with is most nights he wont hurt you, he'll make more "oh, wow" plays than he will "oh crap" plays, and as long as you arent expecting him to be a game changer or that one missing piece that wins it all for you, you probably wont be disappointed

PredsV82 is offline   Reply With Quote