Why not Dekanich?
View Single Post
07-10-2010, 01:56 PM
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, CANADA
Originally Posted by
It'd be a spit in the face if Dekanich was worthy of the job. he's an inconsistent AHL goalie with a year and a half of sometimes starter, sometimes backup duty behind him. Pickard and Lindback may be younger, but I'd feel significantly safer with either in the net...though I'd still prefer to bring in a vet for a year or two.
It looks to me like Dekanich was alot more than inconsistent as you say.
Here is a snippet from this article,
"Dekanich, 24, has gained experience with Milwaukee of the American Hockey League. He is entering his third season and was fifth in the AHL this year with a 2.33 goals against average. He went 27-16-4 with four shutouts and a .914 save percentage"
Let Pickard headman Milwaukee next season because sitting around as a backup in Nashville is pointless for him.
I think Dekanich gets the backup nod personally, with Lindback a close call.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by lightning_legwand*