Thread: Confirmed with Link: Kovalchuk Deal Rejected
View Single Post
Old
07-20-2010, 09:39 PM
  #48
Giroux tha Damaja
Registered User
 
Giroux tha Damaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Holly, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,232
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Giroux tha Damaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny View Post
The NHL being ass backwards again, making it up as they go along.

It doesn't matter if it's blatant cap circumvention, there isn't a rule against it and they haven't made any concerted effort to amend the current rule. They've got no precedent other than "Because we say so."
The language about cap circumvention is pretty vague in the CBA. What constitutes is can be anything, so long as the league can prove that the intention was to subvert the intention of the rules in some way. I think if it goes before an arbitrator, they're going to have a very easy case, and the Devils are going to have a difficult time explaining the structure of that contract. Their best bet would to try and claim that the extreme front loading is to avoid inflation (i.e. the more Kovalchuk gets payed up front, the more he can invest right away and not have a lot of the value of his contract shrink due to inflation). That's a tough sell.

Giroux tha Damaja is offline   Reply With Quote