Thread: Confirmed with Link: Kovalchuk Deal Rejected
View Single Post
Old
07-28-2010, 01:51 PM
  #201
IrishSniper87
Registered User
 
IrishSniper87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Media, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
Actually, I think that's a big problem for the NHL. Why?

1) You have concerns about those contracts, but no proof that actual cap circumvention plans (player not playing the finals years of the the contract is intended).

2) You have concerns about this contract, but no proof that actual cap circumvention plans exist (presumably, if they do then it's an easy ruling).

Why aren't you simply registering the Kovalchuk contract and investigating it until you have evidence like the others?

Ultimately their argument has to rest on something concrete to be really legitimate, no matter how "right" they are that the contract is BS.
Immediate reg flag on the fact the vet minimum in 2024 will likely not be under 600k due to inflation. I believe Kovalchuk would be signed for $585k in 2027.

IrishSniper87 is offline   Reply With Quote