View Single Post
08-05-2010, 12:36 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Behind the enemy lin
Originally Posted by
Mark Stuart and a late 1st for Zach Parise.... you wouldn't do that? But the Bruins selected Stuart BEFORE Parise so he must be more valuable.
Maybe the Bruins do prefer Colborne, but Team Canada obviously didn't. Eberle was a star on that team and Colborne didn't make it. As someone else said the only thing Colborne has as a player over Eberle is size, and yet he doesn't really use it.
So yeah, I wouldn't have a problem trading a late 1st round pick to get a player I think is significantly better. Would you trade Lucic for a lesser player and a late 1st?? You must be insane not to.
Your post have a lot of flaws, first the Bruins didn't draft Stuart before Parisť, And Eberle is miles from parisť.
second a lot a players who were WJC stars never really play in the NHL or wasn't really good NHLer. you give way too much important to the ''junior'' success.
I'm not saying Eberle can be a bust or not better than Colborne in the future but Today I take Colborne project over Eberle, let alone adding a first pick
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bruinster*