View Single Post
08-09-2010, 05:19 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somerville, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 6,177
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by J17 Vs Proclamation View Post
So you're reply consists of a paragraph with a basic babbling, questioning now the parameters of how we measure players and success?

Yet, in your previous post, you say this poll isn't an excerise to judge who will be better in 3-5 years. Yet now you say its a balance between potential and current value, which i assume means NHL closeness, as current value actually includes long-term potential. This completely contradicts what you originally said.

So you have gone from saying this isn't an excersise in judging long-term potential, to saying it is a balance, to quering what the parameters of being the "better player" are. Your argument isn't consistent at all.
i meant this isn't *only* about who will be better in 3-5 years. of course, that's a big part of it. that should've been obvious.

zeroG is offline   Reply With Quote