: News Article:
View Single Post
08-17-2010, 08:54 PM
Join Date: Jul 2010
[QUOTE=E = CH²;27424230]Well you're wrong there so I'm going to assume you haven't read the thread because I put it pretty clearly.
The conditions for release were never that he had to sleep at his parents house.
Lafleur lied to the court on something that was COMPLETELY irrelevant. It's as if the prosecutor had asked if Lafleur's son had eaten chicken in his stay and Lafleur had said no while he really did eat chicken. That's about as relevant. So it's not a technicality, the whole premise was just off from the get go. All 3 judges threw the case without a possibility for appeal because the first judge was so off base.
It was NOT a technicality and if you don't know what you're talking about, it's not an opinion, you should get better information or not comment.
Gee, I wonder why Lafleur didn`t check with the Court about where his son was supposed to stay. The fact is he still lied.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeBlondeDemon10