View Single Post
Old
10-03-2003, 06:46 AM
  #11
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 60,187
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wasting time
In Hitchcok's system the defenseman is not going to be as exposed as in a forecheck system like Quinn's. Also, the D men are not under so much pressure to lug the puck up to the forward versus Quinn's flow and puck possession system.

Plus, Pitkannen is a much better defenseman than is anyone of Carlo, Kondriatev or Hedin.

Plus, the other core 5 in Philly are better than the other 5 from Toronto.

Move along. Nothing to see here.

All True... Yet

Does your points not possibly tell us something as well..

The Question is WHY???

Is Philly's System better??? In Toronto if Hitchcock where coach and they played his style...wouldn't Toronto be a more serious Contender??

Could Leafs just as easily have had Pitkanen...Was Quinn asleep on that one??

If Philly 5 core are better..and we Know it than Why didn't Quinn improve his 5 rather than stand Pat and loose the Wesleys and Svehla's that made it better ...

Although I don't exactly agree here..

Kim Johnsson(39 points),Eric Desjardins, Eric Weinrich, Marcus Ragnarsson, Chris Therien (Waivers)

really much different than.......

Tomas Kaberle (49 points), Brian McCabe, Ken Klee, Bryan Marchment & Aki Berg ???

Mess is offline