View Single Post
08-29-2010, 01:52 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,693
vCash: 500
I agree, Clarke does seem to be made better than he actually was. Sure his 5 best seasons are better than Sakic's. The only problem is that joe sakic's 6th-15th best seasons absoluetly cream Clarke's next 10 best seasons. Clarke was also a no show in international play and just good in the playoffs.

What would I rather have, Joe Sakic's clutchness and superior offense, or the two way play of clarke for about 7-8 years? Not a hard choice at alll.

ushvinder is offline   Reply With Quote