View Single Post
Old
09-24-2010, 10:15 AM
  #39
Wils98
Registered User
 
Wils98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 107
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garbage Goal View Post
So, in short, you're in support of our GM, who has no grasp of what the words "cap compliant" mean, to sign a 40 year-old forward (meaning a 35+ contract) who clearly has nothing left to contribute on the ice whatsoever.

Sounds like an awesome idea.
I've seen this argument a few times that if he signs it will be a 35+ Contract. It is evident that if he signs it will be for a year only, his contract wont be a burden and will not have any effect next year.

Can you stash a 35+ Contract in the minors without takling a hit?

Wils98 is offline   Reply With Quote