Thread: Speculation: Lecavalier or Richards?
View Single Post
09-25-2010, 02:46 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,687
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
Originally Posted by SupersonicMonkey View Post
I have to bury my head in my hands reading some if this stuff.

Stepan isn't as good as Lecavalier, so we should trade all of our prospects (because that's what it would take) for a guy who's contract is worse then any contract in Rangers history.

They didn't just clear Redden's cap hit so they could go out and get worse contracts.

And contrary to some here, Stepan WILL be the face of the organization, bank it, the kid is going to be a leader by example and voice, and if this team ever wins the Cup again, he's going to be the one that leads them there.

Lofty, fine, but that's how it'll be. And I'm sure that's what they're hoping for.

People who don't want a young team, people who don't value rooks and prospects, should just stop watching the Rangers, because that's the future of the organization.
So now you know how much it will cost to get Vinny? All our prospects huh?

We waived Redden because we are over the cap with him.

A team full of youngsters will never happen here. You will always need veterans to help the young players along. Look at what MDZ said about Redden. I can only imagine what Dubinsky, Staal, Cally, ect would say about Drury, Rozsival. You know the guys most of you all hate.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote