The Trade Proposal Thread 2010 (part 4)
View Single Post
10-18-2010, 11:47 AM
Join Date: Apr 2010
Originally Posted by
79 André Marcoux
That's WAY to much. At the trade deadline, Hammer will not have negative value, far from there. If the Flames were to acquire him, they could just let him walk this summer. There's no way that I would give three solid and young assets AND 2 1st round picks for Regehr. Not to mention that Hammer is still a solid defenseman.
EDIT : I just saw Iginla... now I understand! But he isn't available and what we really need is Regehr.
Ya, but you have to think if we are trading prospects for Regehr that is a pretty big sign that the Flames are rebuilding which might be a good chance to pick off Iginla too.
For just Regehr, I dont think we would need more than a roster player and a prospect.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Habiton