View Single Post
10-22-2010, 09:52 AM
El Emperor
Registered User
El Emperor's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 1,310
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by infidelappel View Post
I didn't think there WAS a call on the ice. They blew play dead and immediately went and reviewed it; I never saw a no-goal signal, just the ref holding his hands up to stop play.

I don't see the issue, it was clearly a goal.
Now that I know it's a goal, it's a moot point... however, I'm confused as to why after reviewing the goal, they claimed "the call on the ice stands" as a goal when there was never a goal called. There was a ref that blew the play dead, but there was never an official goal signal (at least from my vantage point). The call on the ice greatly impacts the result of a review... just like reviews in football.

This all could have been avoided if our defense woke up and played to their potential.

El Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote