View Single Post
Old
11-05-2010, 10:33 AM
  #11
Jester
Registered User
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Andrews
Country: Scotland
Posts: 34,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLHockeyKnight View Post
That could easily be done, and they should.

As for the glow pucks, they were expensive as all hell. Unless they impose a "throw the puck back" policy for the crowd, we'll never see it again.
The cost of that type of technology has plummeted, however. So, they could theoretically pull it off. They also don't lose that many pucks anymore with the netting behind the nets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
This could've been used for the Wellwood incident last night?

Or would that still not have been reviewable?
Did the puck go in the net on that play?

Would depend on the scope they gave to it... that was a rough call on Wellwood.

Jester is offline   Reply With Quote