View Single Post
11-09-2010, 08:25 AM
Global Moderator
tarheelhockey's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 49,186
vCash: 1020
Originally Posted by TheDevilMadeMe View Post
In my opinion, if you don't do a chronological process, you are basically re-doing the Top 100 list under a different name with a different cutoff point.
I'm not saying it must be completely non-chronological, but doing it in a year-by-year format introduces all the same weaknesses as the real-life HoF voting process. Basically it would just be a reenactment/fantasy exercise... which could be interesting in it's own right, but IMO kind of trivializes the project.

If the idea here is to have a "cornerstone" project, one which defines the forum consensus as to who is in/out of the pantheon, we shouldn't put ourselves in a position to vote for weaker candidates based on the timing of their eligibility.

tarheelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote