View Single Post
Old
11-16-2010, 09:05 PM
  #40
Catamarca Livin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,030
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=deckercky;28985523]I thought the whole defence looked off last game without the Edler-Ehrhoff pairing. IMO the defence top to bottom last game should have been:

Edler-Ehrhoff
Hamhuis-Rome
Alberts-Bieksa

I've been impressed by Alberts-Bieksa as a bottom pairing. This game, slot in Ballard for Rome and you have:

Edler-Ehrhoff
Hamhuis-Ballard
Alberts-Bieksa

Three pairings you feel comfortable with. If you're worried, sit one of the 4th liners and have Rome as an emergency fill-in in case Ballard can't handle the minutes or Alberts has one of those games.

I like the Alberts- Bieksa pairing as well Hamhuis Bieksa look bad together. I think Alberts style helps Bieksa alot. They were being put against the top line before so AV had confidence in them also. Hamhuis Bieksa started the season together and it was not pretty. Give Hamhuis Ballard a shot i think they might compliment each other. Of course Rome would be missed on the second pp unit.

Catamarca Livin is offline