CIS Hockey: Official Hollywood Top 34: 2010-11
View Single Post
11-19-2010, 11:16 AM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Originally Posted by
Do you really think the coaches would vote for the team that truly belongs or, instead, maybe vote for ANY team OTHER than the one which that coach/team would least desire to play and therefore effectively vote for one of the top-ranked teams that they would simply be OK with playing?
It may be simpler just to go with the next top-ranked team in the CIS Top 10 not already going, no?? (If you want to trust the CIS Top 10 people and that's a whole other topic.) Of course, this would practically ensure UNB and Alberta an automatic berth to the University Cup and eliminate any true playoff upsets. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Are second chances in the true spirit of sport?
Another option would be to always have the
with the host team being one of the two from its respective conference. Yet another would to go to a four-team Memorial Cup-style tournament with the AUS, CW and OUA East/West champions along with the host team.
I think the 2-2-2 scenario makes the most sense if you are to stick with the current format. Having years where the AUS or the CW gets 1 berth makes no sense to me, and 2 teams, one from the OUA West and one from the OUA East is enough each year.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by blackmarketmob