View Single Post
Old
10-06-2003, 05:08 PM
  #27
dawgbone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,104
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to dawgbone Send a message via MSN to dawgbone
Quote:
Originally Posted by igor
I'm having trouble seeing the logic in your second paragraph. And I especially fail to see how that lends creedance to the first paragraph ... if anything just the opposite. Since the reclaiming team left the player unprotected in the first place, they surely weren't destined for the NHL squad.
You kind of missed it.

The reason why there is waivers is because the NHLPA fought for it a long time ago. This was so that players could play in the NHL for a team that wanted them there, instead of being trapped on the farm.

If the Oilers want to send him to the farm, he had to clear waivers. Florida wanted him on their team to be their backup. Well if they decide to send him down, it isn't fair to the Oilers, because they were going to use the player in the exact same way.

It is one of those rules that actually benefits both the owners and the players.

dawgbone is offline