View Single Post
11-21-2010, 06:27 PM
nyranger61494's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 3,896
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jas View Post
Again, different arguments, which I am not disputing. My point was that signing Kovalchuk did not pull money away from the Debbies addressing their defense. Yes, signing Volchenkov and Tallinder could be the Debbies' version of Ulanov and Karpa. Doesn't it say more about the Debbies' ability to draft and develop young D-men, as opposed to the signing of Kovalchuk?
Fair points as usual jas. They screwed themselves in more ways than one. Had they developed the young depth defensemen, then as I point out, Kovalchuk would have had no bearing on that. However, they didn't and were then unable to address their blue line through free agency. I think we actually agree here.

nyranger61494 is offline   Reply With Quote