View Single Post
Old
06-05-2005, 11:43 AM
  #32
T2M
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 635
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSorley 33
Good point, I like the sound of Denis and Rich Petiot on a future line. It could happen and makes sense from a small man big man pairing.
I like the thought of it too. I think that if Grebs can become an average in zone defender then his offense will make him a major part of the team. I never expected him to be a Blake or Pronger, Lindstrom would have been nice but it's clear that Grebs doesn't have the positional game of a Lindstrom (that being said, Denis, if you'd like to surprise us and break out consistent Norris Trophy form I won't complain). All in all Grebeshkov looks like an important piece of the puzzle, but he's not a keystone. All the complaining about Grebs' defense could easily be turned into critiques of Gleason's not using all his offensive skills. Either way I think they're both young defensemen who will be special parts of the puzzle but I'm not sure they're in that rare, dominating player category. That's fine, not everybody can be. But a really good offensive defenseman who can cover himself would be a welcome addition. I think Grebs needs some more time to just injest information.

T2M is offline