View Single Post
Old
12-01-2010, 09:03 PM
  #76
glenngineer
Registered User
 
glenngineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spring Hill, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,958
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLake View Post
Ever consider those guys were the freshest on the bench and had had a couple of long shifts in the CBJ end of the rink earlier in the game? Columbus was going for it with Nash, Vermette, etc...Trotz wanted to have fresh guys out there that were going to at least not get scored on.

Having played last night and traveled while your opponent sat at home and scouted you, I don't blame Trotz for insuring we got at least a point as time wore down.

As for OT, we are horrible at 4 on 4 hockey. We got burned on it for Columbus's first goal and I honestly think we stood a better chance of getting the second point in the shootout than in OT.

Bottom line...I disagree.
My point exactly, playing not to lose.

glenngineer is offline   Reply With Quote