View Single Post
12-09-2010, 11:23 AM
Join Date: May 2002
Originally Posted by
maybe Walker was but I believe Kimmo was picked up for "future considerations"
and in any case the loss of Jones was similar to the loss of Walker.. if we had really wanted to keep Jones we could have given him a QO... just as Vancouver could have protected Walker and exposed someone else. Just like we gambled and lost jones, they gambled and lost Walker
Wasn't that part of a deal with LA then though, if I remember correctly we took a goalie in the expansion draft so they wouldn't be able to lose a goalie the next drafts even though we never expected to use the goalie we picked up. As a return, they had this "future considerations" deal?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by triggrman