The Real Reason to Fire Darryl Sutter
View Single Post
12-09-2010, 08:40 PM
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by
It was a bad trade no matter which way you shake it.
If Stuart would of been under a multi year contract
then that would of been a huge difference and then it would of been a good trade and the asking price would of likely been the same.
Stuart > Ference
Kobasew > Primeau
Stuart never really looked that happy to be traded here. Sutter should of realized the likely hood of him resigning here was slim, hell 3/4's of fans in the city knew he was goner after the season, you would think Sutter would of known the same. I will give Stuart credit for going about his business and doing a good job on the ice when he was here. The reason I think it was a bad trade was Ference and Kobasew were 2 of our better younger players on the roster at the time, and we traded them away for a rental and an old 4th line grinder. Another typical Sutter move which hurt the Flames in the long run. If you think the trade was so good, ask yourself do you honestly think Sutter would repeat the trade knowing Stuart would walk away at seasons end? Not a chance he would. And the prospects that we now have that you mentioned could end up being very good, but by the time they are ready to make an impact on the Flames it will be 6-8 years from the time Ference and Kobasew got dealt.
Stuart would never be traded at the deadline if he was not a pending UFA (rental)
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by GoFlames