Thread: Proposal: Boston-Calgary
View Single Post
01-22-2011, 10:40 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,161
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ice Cream Man View Post
You indirectly implied it, mate, without you even knowing it. Go back and really think about what you posted there.

LOL. You're implying here that if we trade Iginla, it will be for a lesser package than what we want?Your arguments are incredibly bizarre.

Calgary simply won't make a trade if we don't get the return we want. As much as you don't want to believe it, Calgary is in the driver's seat here.

TO's first will be in play if you are seeking a player like Jarome Iginla - especially around trade deadline, where values are inflated.

Really, it's that simple.
I think he is implying that either Iginla won't get what hte Flames fans on HFboards want for him and if the Flames really want to trade Iginla, they will take the best offfer and if they decide it isn't what they want, they will keep him.

I really don't see how you can argue with that statement. It comes down to saying either the Flames take what they can get or don't trade him, there is absolutely nothing controversial about that statement.

nmbr_24 is offline   Reply With Quote